Workflow: User enters their username and password, what happens next?

 Let’s walk through the flow step by step with the logs you shared, just like I would in a senior/principal code review session.

1. You Submit Username and Password

  • You enter credentials on the login form (served by the identity-backend).

  • Identity-backend verifies your input, and (since they match the demo creds) issues a one-time auth code.

  • You are redirected back to the client (API Gateway) with ?code=...&state=... in the URL.

2. API Gateway Receives the Auth Code

  • The browser makes a GET request to /callback with the code and state.

  • API Gateway exchanges this code for a JWT by POSTing to the identity-backend /token endpoint.

  • Identity-backend responds with a valid JWT (id_token).

3. API Gateway Verifies the JWT

  • First verification:

    [verify_id_token] TokenHash=1e1ed2f44b21 Decoded claims: { ... }

    • Claims show the token is fresh (iat, exp), valid audience, and issuer.

  • Second verification:

    [verify_id_token] Token valid for sub=username (TokenHash=1e1ed2f44b21), checked in 2.0248s

    • Token is accepted, session is now authenticated for user username.

4. Successful Login is Logged

  • Gateway logs the successful login event with all context (sub, aud, code hash, IP, UA, etc.):

    [callback] Login success: sub=username, email=-, aud=browser-ui, ...

    • This log is a great audit trail; it ties the login to the code used, user agent, and other metadata.

5. Home Page Loads

  • The browser is redirected to / (the home page).

  • Gateway again verifies the JWT (to ensure you’re still authenticated):

    [verify_id_token] TokenHash=1e1ed2f44b21 Decoded claims: { ... }
[verify_id_token] Token valid for sub=username ...

  • Home page is rendered (200 OK).

6. Static Assets and Logs

  • Browser loads your stylesheet, hits /logs.json for log display in the UI.

  • Favicon (/favicon.ico) is missing (404, not a big deal for MVP).

7. Periodic Log Requests

  • /logs.json is hit every 30 seconds or so (probably for live log updates in the UI).

  • All is working smoothly.

What’s the Big Picture?

  • Login flow is working exactly as designed:

    1. User logs in → gets code.

    2. API Gateway exchanges code for JWT.

    3. JWT is verified, session is authenticated.

    4. Home page loads, static assets and logs are fetched.

  • Security:

    • JWT is checked at each important step.

    • Logs give you complete traceability.

  • No errors or warnings (except missing favicon, which is cosmetic).

What’s Next?

  • User is authenticated until token expires (then will repeat the login flow as you saw earlier).

  • The log entries and flow are exactly what you want to see for a secure, auditable login process.

Anything else confusing in the logs, or want to trace a logout, file upload, or other flow next?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Feature: Audit log for one login, and identity service

Image
Customer (Product) Page High-Level System Design Diagram (PlantUML) Sequence Diagram: Audit Event Ingestion Sequence Diagram: Orchestration Event For a High-Level System (Component) Diagram The queue is implemented as message_queue (generic), and the audit log service consumes from it, writing to a dedicated audit_log table. The logging service also consumes from the same message_queue and writes to log_store. Orchestration/other services use the same queue. Summary Table: What Writes Where Event Type Goes Into Consumed By Final Storage audit message_queue Audit Log Service audit_log table log message_queue Logging Service log_store table doc_uploaded message_queue Orchestration Worker (business DB, or triggers next event) ocr_ready message_queue Notification Worker, etc. (notification log, etc.)  Core Tables message_queue – universal event bus (temp buffer) audit_log – immutable audit/compliance events log_store – application logs (op...
Read more

Getting started - Build your data science lab environment

This guide explains how to set up a complete data science environment for the udemy program. A proper setup ensures compatibility and avoids recurring environment issues.  1. Overview Goal : Create a full-featured environment with sufficient resources for all course exercises. Recommendation : Use Anaconda for the most reliable setup. Alternative : Use a Python virtual environment with pip if Anaconda isn’t working. 2. Setup Options Primary (Recommended) Create a dedicated Anaconda environment (isolated, compatible). Alternative Use a standard Python virtualenv + pip (faster but less reliable). 3. Windows Setup Steps Clone Course Repository git clone https://github.com/ed-donner/llm_engineering/ Follow the repository’s README.md instructions for additional setup details. Create Anaconda Environment Inside the llm_engineering folder: conda env create -f environment.yml ⏳ This may take several minutes. Activate the environment: conda activate llms Deactivat...
Read more

QA - Run #1 - Results

Image
# QA Report for Tag QA_July2025_A - **Tag/Commit:** QA_July2025_A (`f32abc1`) - **Date:** 2025-08-01 - **QA Outcomes:** All tests passed except for file upload (see below)... - **Environment:** Windows 10, Python 3.12, requirements.txt as of tag - **Notes:** See log for detailed results. ## Issue Found - **Step:** - **Bug:** - **Log excerpt:** - **Screenshot:** For this QA run, we begin with pristine state by: Stop all services Delete logs.db, and jobs.db Delete all files in doc_store folder Start all services Test, you should see no data on index page, and query should result in no data found error Next, go ahead and upload new1.txt, and after that new2.txt Issue the query: "can you summarize all of the todo items you can find, seperating each one on a single line, with due date first, then title, and description with any details you can augment" Expected Answer: - August 1, 2025: Respond to Amira and discuss weekend plans - August 3, 2025: Go to Somesh class and finish ta...
Read more