Feature: Tags

 Yes, adding tags is a great next step for your RAG MVP—here’s why:


1. You’re at the “Useful Search” Milestone

  • Right now, you have uploads and query, but all queries hit the full dataset.

  • Tags are a minimal but powerful way to introduce “search scope” and personalization, without building complex user/project hierarchies yet.


2. Why Tags (vs. Projects)?

  • Tags are flexible: Users can attach multiple tags per doc, enabling cross-cutting context (e.g., #contracts, #vendorA, #q3-2025).

  • Easy UX: Add on upload, update later, and pick in a dropdown when querying.

  • Simple implementation: Just a many-to-many table (files_tags), and a filter at query time.

  • No project complexity yet: “Projects” require more permissions logic, nested UIs, ownership, etc. Tags are lightweight.


3. Tags Unlock Several MVP Features

  • Query by topic/client/date—huge for user control.

  • Foundation for future access control (“only show my #legal docs”).

  • Super useful for QA and error tracing (e.g., “show logs for #error-handling”).

  • Makes your product feel 10x more usable—people want to “slice” their info fast.


4. What Comes Next After Tags?

  • After tags: maybe add “starred/favorites,” or usage-based ordering.

  • If you need multi-user support, you can “upgrade” tags to project/workspace logic later.

  • Tags can also become the building blocks for recommendations, analytics, etc.


Bottom Line

Adding tags now is:

  • The smallest “step-change” in real value for end users

  • The simplest architectural change for your codebase

  • The perfect precursor to more advanced org/permission features later


If you want a sample schema, UX sketch, or migration plan, just ask!
Want to talk through edge cases? I got you.
But yes—tags are 100% the right next step right now.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Feature: Audit log for one login, and identity service

Getting started - Build your data science lab environment

QA - Run #1 - Results