Feature: Tags
Yes, adding tags is a great next step for your RAG MVP—here’s why:
1. You’re at the “Useful Search” Milestone
-
Right now, you have uploads and query, but all queries hit the full dataset.
-
Tags are a minimal but powerful way to introduce “search scope” and personalization, without building complex user/project hierarchies yet.
2. Why Tags (vs. Projects)?
-
Tags are flexible: Users can attach multiple tags per doc, enabling cross-cutting context (e.g., #contracts, #vendorA, #q3-2025).
-
Easy UX: Add on upload, update later, and pick in a dropdown when querying.
-
Simple implementation: Just a many-to-many table (
files_tags), and a filter at query time. -
No project complexity yet: “Projects” require more permissions logic, nested UIs, ownership, etc. Tags are lightweight.
3. Tags Unlock Several MVP Features
-
Query by topic/client/date—huge for user control.
-
Foundation for future access control (“only show my #legal docs”).
-
Super useful for QA and error tracing (e.g., “show logs for #error-handling”).
-
Makes your product feel 10x more usable—people want to “slice” their info fast.
4. What Comes Next After Tags?
-
After tags: maybe add “starred/favorites,” or usage-based ordering.
-
If you need multi-user support, you can “upgrade” tags to project/workspace logic later.
-
Tags can also become the building blocks for recommendations, analytics, etc.
Bottom Line
Adding tags now is:
-
The smallest “step-change” in real value for end users
-
The simplest architectural change for your codebase
-
The perfect precursor to more advanced org/permission features later
If you want a sample schema, UX sketch, or migration plan, just ask!
Want to talk through edge cases? I got you.
But yes—tags are 100% the right next step right now.
Comments
Post a Comment